![]() ![]() The Pastons wouldn't have been thrown by meeting a Joffrey or a Margaery, especially since medieval spelling was a creative business. And that might mean HBO rather than history Game of Thrones, not the real wars of the roses. The clue may be in the small print: coming into fashion, we're told, are "medieval- style" names. What we do know is that babies were often named by or for their chief godparent, which could produce unpredictable results: the two eldest sons of the 15th-century Paston family were both called John, which also – confusingly – happened to be the name of their father.īut a world in which everyone is called John is clearly not the olde England this survey has in mind. ![]() Medieval Netmums would have had their work cut out, mind you, since no public records were kept of baptisms (or marriages or burials) before the parish registers of the 16th century. And if the crown had passed to Henry's grandson Alfonso, heir to the throne for 10 years before his early death in 1284, there might well have been an Iberian flavour to the "most popular" lists by the turn of the 14th century. It wasn't until the mid-13th century, when Henry III decided to call his son and heir after the Anglo-Saxon royal saint Edward the Confessor, that Edward – until then as unprepossessing a choice as Egfrith – became once again a name to conjure with at the font. After the conquest of 1066, everyone who was anyone aspired to the Norman names of the new ruling classes – William, Robert, Matilda, Joan – rather than the Aethelflaeds and Aelfgifus of the defeated Anglo-Saxons. So if these aren't actually medieval names, what are? Well, fashions came and went in the middle ages, just as they do now. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |